Am 29.03.2016 um 23:01 schrieb Moritz Mühlenhoff:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 10:03:56PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
>> The Security Team decided to mark the issues in Jessie as no-dsa because
>> we only ship the servlet API and documentation in this release which
>> can't be affected by security vulnerabilities at all. I wouldn't mind
>> uploading the 6.0.45+dfsg-1~deb8u1 to Jessie but I think we can safely
>> ignore the version number skew in this case. All Wheezy users who update
>> to Jessie will keep 6.0.45+dfsg-1~deb7u1 for the servlet API and Jessie
>> only users will continue to use 6.0.41. They will not be placed in a
>> worse position.
>>
>> If you feel more comfortable with an updated source package in Jessie, I
>> will gladly upload this one to Jessie.
> 
> I missed the wheezy > jessie version skew aspect. In that case let's also
> upgrade tomcat6 in jessie even though it's a NOP.
> 
> But all those rdeps of libservlet2.5-java should really be upgraded
> to libservlet3.1-java.

I have updated the Tomcat 6 package in Jessie. I'm attaching the debdiff
between the version in wheezy-security and this one for comparison.
Shall I upload to security-master or to jessie directly?

Regards,

Markus


Attachment: tomcat6_jessie.debdiff.gz
Description: application/gzip

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to