YunQiang Su: > On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 4:41 PM, Niels Thykier <ni...@thykier.net> wrote: >> [...] >> AFAICT, we are still missing: >> >> * A rebuild of the last package [mipsel64import] > > This is a bug of gcc, and the gcc team in IMG is working on it. > It also effects lua. >
Thanks for the update. :) >> * DSA maintained buildds (admittedly, I did not look for one). > > mips64el shares the same machines with mipsel. > All machines for mipsel can be configured to build for mips64el at the > same time. > > [...] In other words, there is a DSA buildd? I notice we have the following list of mipsel/mips64el buildds: * mips64el: eberlin, mipsel-aql-01, mipsel-aql-02, mipsel-manda-01, mipsel-manda-02 - I presume none of them are DSA given mips64el currently has a note of not having a DSA buildd. * mipsel: mayer, eysler, rem, phrixos (non-DSA), helle (non-DSA) Are these lists up to date? If so, we only seem to have 4 DSA buildds to be shared between mipsel and mips64el. Are some of these being migrated to/replaced with DSA buildds? Thanks, ~Niels
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature