On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 09:58:27 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 03/08/16 02:02, Peter Colberg wrote: > > Dear Debian Release Team, > > > > twinkle has been marked for autoremoval from testing on 2016-08-27 due > > to this FTBFS. Building ucommon with GCC 6 instead of GCC 5 yields > > slight differences in the list of visible symbols. > > > > How should this bug be dealt with? Is it not simply a matter of > > waiting for GCC 6 to become default, uploading ucommon with an > > updated symbols file and an ABI bump (if needed), and submitting > > binNMUs for dependent packages? > > Yes. > If binNMUs of dependent packages are necessary then something's gone very wrong...
Cheers, Julien