On 05/09/16 14:37, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > On 09/05/2016 10:54 AM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >> On 09/04/2016 05:32 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >>> On 09/04/2016 12:02 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >>>> On 03/09/16 21:41, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >>>>> proj (4.9.3-1) has been uploaded to unstable, and has been built on all >>>>> release architectures. The ports need a little more time. >>>> >>>> binnmus scheduled. >>> >>> Many thanks for those. >>> >>> In general the rebuild look good so far. The binNMUs did reveal a few >>> packages with issues on some of the architectures. >>> >>> postgis FTBFS due to test failures caused by the fakeroot fix for >>> #830912 not being used yet. Those builds should succeed when they use >>> fakeroot (1.21-2). Can dep-waits be set for those? >> >> postgis still needs to be rebuilt with fakeroot (1.21-2). The following >> should do, perhaps the libproj-dev dependency should be specified too: >> >> dw postgis_2.2.2+dfsg-4 . ANY . -m 'fakeroot (>= 1.21-2)' >> >>> mapserver FTBFS on mipsel due to a fatal error in the Java Runtime >>> Environment. I think retrying the build on a different buildd should let >>> that succeed too, mipsel-manda-01 had issues with mapserver before. >> >> mapserver is now OK thanks to the rebuilt on eberlin. >> >>> qlandkartegt FTBFS on some architectures where char is probably unsigned >>> by default. I've added a patch which should fix the issue, but still >>> needs verification on the porterboxes. I'll upload a new revision if the >>> builds on the porterboxes confirm the fix. >> >> qlandkartegt is now OK too with the changes in 1.8.1+ds-7. >> >> >> The affected packages in experimental need to be rebuilt with proj 4.9.3 >> too: >> >> grass (7.0.5~rc1-1~exp1) >> mapnik (3.0.12~rc6+ds-1~exp2) >> spatialite (4.4.0~rc1-1~exp1) >> >> python-mapnik (1:0.0~20160810-3a60211-1~exp1) >> spatialite-tools (4.4.0~rc1-1~exp1) >> >> I think the attached wanna-build commands should do for the above >> packages in experimental. > > vtk6 on armel still hasn't starting building yet, can the priority be > increased to hopefully prevent another entanglement issue like near the > end of the gdal transition (#823335)?
There's no rush here. gdal is different because there all packages need to migrate at the same time. I have given back vtk6/mipsel, let's see if that was a transient issue. Cheers, Emilio