Your message dated Tue, 11 Oct 2016 00:35:41 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#835170: transition: protobuf
has caused the Debian Bug report #835170,
regarding transition: protobuf
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
835170: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=835170
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: [email protected]
Usertags: transition
Control: forwarded -1
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-protobuf.html
The upload of protobuf (3.0.0-1) to unstable has started an uncoordinated
transition.
Dmitry, have you tested the reverse dependencies if they still build?
I'll test the affected packages maintained by the Debian GIS team and
upload them to unstable if they build successfully. I'd rather not have
to take care of the other affected packages too.
Kind Regards,
Bas
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 03/09/16 11:51, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 02/09/16 11:48, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> protobuf (3.0.0-7) has been uploaded to unstable which contains a patch
>> to fix the ostinato build failure (#).
>>
>> Can you schedule a dep-wait to rebuild ostinato (0.8-1) with
>> libprotobuf-dev (3.0.0-7) once that's available on the buildds?
>
> Scheduled.
This transition is done, closing.
Emilio
--- End Message ---
