Hi Adrian, On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 10:27:18AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > > I'm now realising that the first option has installable candidates which > > is astonishing since I assumed that with a new source package upload the > > binaries created by the previous version would vanish from the mirrors. > > That's the first case I see this happen. Did I miss anything? :-( > > > > In any case libgtkdatabox-0.9.2-0-dev and > > libgtkdatabox-0.9.2-0_0.9.2.0+dfsg-1_amd64.deb should vanish from the > > mirrors. > > "only look at the first option" != "use the first available option" > > To prevent exactly this kind of problems, the libgtkdatabox-dev > alternative in the build dependencies won't be considered by the > buildds for unstable.
I think we are discussing about two different things. On one hand its simple to drop libgtkdatabox-0.9.2-0-dev from the Build-Depends and just leave libgtkdatabox-dev. That should easily fix the build. The other problem is that libgtkdatabox-0.9.2-0-dev should not be any more in the pool at all and I have no idea why this is the case. Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de