Hi Hleb, all, On 18-03-21 23:29:33, Hleb Valoshka wrote: > On 3/21/18, Cédric Boutillier <[email protected]> wrote: > > Is it "normal" that ruby-gettext-setup tests fail with the new > > ruby-gettext? They seem to pass with the current version on > > ci.debian.net. > > I've checked ruby-gettext-setup and can say that it doesn't actually > use anything from gettext gem, only from fast-gettext. So its test > failures caused by something else, not the new gettext version.
I would be interested in how you came to this conclusion: ruby-gettext-setup FTBFS now, with errors like /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/gettext/tools/parser/ruby.rb:50:in `gsub': invalid byte sequence in US-ASCII (ArgumentError) See #894829 for details. IOW: We should take regressions in autopkgtests seriously. If we don't, chances are high we're just running into situations like this one, causing extra work for all people involved. Cheers, Georg
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
