Hi, On 18-04-04 23:58:32, Hleb Valoshka wrote: > On 4/4/18, Georg Faerber <ge...@riseup.net> wrote: > > ruby-gettext-setup FTBFS now, with errors like > > > > /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/gettext/tools/parser/ruby.rb:50:in `gsub': > > invalid byte sequence in US-ASCII (ArgumentError) > > > > See #894829 for details. > > > > /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/gettext/tools/parser/ruby.rb is UTF-8 file, > it contains japanese letters (こんにちは世界), of course these letters > can't be processed in C locale. > > So you either patch it to remove UTF-8 characters or run tests in > C.UTF-8.
Please go ahead and feel free to fix the package; I failed to do so yesterday, but I've to admit, I didn't spent much time. Also, my local setup is currently broken. > I don't think that the last ruby-gettext update introduced a > regression as in the previous version it had a terrible insecure > parser for ruby strings: > begin; s = eval(s); rescue Exception; end I don't get the relation between "no regression" and "previous version had a terrible insecure parser". > Now it has a proper one. No doubt -- thanks for your work and the upload. The point I was trying to make: Let's work together, better (in the future). For example: Before uploading such a change, communicate about it especially if it introduces a breaking change. Cheers, Georg
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature