On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 01:04:13PM +0200, Felix Salfelder wrote: > if that's correct, we shouldn't link libtrilinos_teuchoscore.so to a > particular revision of libbfd-2.26-system.so. how would that be > possible? > > otoh, if libbfd-2.26.1-system.so > - is meant to replace libbfd-2.26-system.so, shouldn't there be a > symlink? > - is NOT meant to provide libbfd-2.26-system.so, then why are these not > coinstallable?
Dynamically linking libbfd-*-system.so is no allowed. This is explicitly stated in the package description of binutils-dev. If you absolutely must link libbfd, link it statically and add an appropriate Built-Using header. Helmut -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
