The binutils support in trilinos is far from being critical, so I'd say for making things a little easier we just turn it off.
@Felix Agreed? Cheers, Nico On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 12:15 AM Helmut Grohne <hel...@subdivi.de> wrote: > On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 01:04:13PM +0200, Felix Salfelder wrote: > > if that's correct, we shouldn't link libtrilinos_teuchoscore.so to a > > particular revision of libbfd-2.26-system.so. how would that be > > possible? > > > > otoh, if libbfd-2.26.1-system.so > > - is meant to replace libbfd-2.26-system.so, shouldn't there be a > > symlink? > > - is NOT meant to provide libbfd-2.26-system.so, then why are these not > > coinstallable? > > Dynamically linking libbfd-*-system.so is no allowed. This is explicitly > stated in the package description of binutils-dev. > > If you absolutely must link libbfd, link it statically and add an > appropriate Built-Using header. > > Helmut > >
-- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
