On Sun, May 14, 2006 at 06:20:25PM +0200, Thomas Walter wrote: > Hello, > > >From my point of view this 2 section names are arbitrary and too global. > It also opens a long discussion about the hirarchy. I think Mathematics > is also part of Science. At least for application like axiom, octave, > mathematica, ... > So having a Math section in parallel to Science could be for more > "calulator" oriented SW.
Well most mathematical software I know are oriented toward doing computation. > In general, my understanding of "Science" is in the sense of research > and not education. > Thus an example breakdown within Sience could be like > Mathematics > Physics > Bio > Chemistry > Astronomics > Geology Could you provide packages list to flesh these sections ? > where some applications or tools can be part of several sub-sections. > Perhaps applications which could be used in nearly all sub-sections > could go into a "General" or "Common" Section. We absolutly try to avoid catch-all subsections because they tend to be used as dumping ground for anything that do not fit in the structure instead of leading people to improve the structure. > In parallel to section "Science" have a section "Education". "Education" is listed in the draft: Education Educational and training software. gtypist, gcompris, quiz Cheers, -- Bill. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Imagine a large red swirl here. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]