Felipe Figueiredo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thursday 24 July 2008 03:29:00 Christophe Prud'homme wrote: > > > === Finite Element Analysis === > > > proposed -- field::physics:fea > > > (it isn't clear to me that this should be in physics rather than > > > engineering, so maybe field::fea would be better) > > In the particular example of FE, it's "made" in a Mathematics/Numerical > Analysis framework, but most popularly used in Physics and Engineering. IMO, > this is the core of this discussion. > > Does the tagging take into account the Field that uses the technique, or the > one that makes/improves it? Maybe there should be some discussion in regard > to policy to this matter, if there hasn't already been one. >
I'm not goint to debconf, but for those that are, perhaps they can discuss this in person - particularly with Enrico. A useful outcome would be a clear set of guidelines on how the current tags should be used. Ideally uploaded to the debtags wiki (and referenced from the DebianScience wiki) Another outcome is a list of possible further tags - or how to use the current tags to best effect[1]. Chris [1] A tag I'm wondering about is one that addresses the concept of dealing with crystal/molecular structure - molecular graphics packages do this along with visualisation, but so do things like various crystallography packages and EXAFS packages. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
