On Mon, 2010-01-04 at 15:46 +0100, Manuel Prinz wrote: > Am Montag, den 28.12.2009, 14:08 +0100 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum: > > OK, let's do that. We can always revisit this decision after the squeeze > > release, but it's important to have something sane for squeeze. > > > > Sylvestre, can you take the lead on that, as you proposed? The required > > steps, I think are: > > - change mpi-default to use OpenMPI + MPICH2 > > I took care of that. Changes are in the Git repository. I will do some > additional testing and coordinate the upload and binNMUs with the > release team. Should I CC d...@l.d.o or d-...@l.a.d.o?
Hi Manuel and MPI keepers, were you planning to upload a new version of mpi-default that removes LAM? I think it's LAM that's screwing up the gerris mpi builds. Drew > > - identify the packages that currently use mpi-default need binNMUs or > > full source uploads, and file bugs with severity: serious > > - identify packages that don't use mpi-default yet, but use one of the > > MPI implementations directly, and file bugs: > > severity: serious if they use Mpich1 or LAM > > severity: normal if they use OpenMPI or MPICH2, asking them to switch > > to mpi-default > > This sounds good, I will start filing bugs during the next days. > > Best regards > Manuel > > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-science-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
