Hi, On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 12:15:46AM +0200, Marcin Dulak wrote: > On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 10:57 PM, Michael Banck <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 10:52:05PM +0200, Marcin Dulak wrote: > > > that's my first package. I don't know what would be required to change > > > the name in the ITP and the git repository? > > > > You wouldn't need to change anything there - the source package name > > should stay as it is called upstream, and the ITP bug and the git > > repository are named after the source package (the source package is the > > union of the orig.tar.gz, the .debian.tar.xz and the .dsc. The binary > > packages are the generated .deb files). > > > > The only thing that would need changing would be the Package: field in > > debian/control and possibly currently existing debian/gpaw-setup.* > > files, which would be renamed to debian/gpaw-data.*. Finally, I assume > > gpaw Depends/Build-Depends on gpaw-setups, so its dependencies would > > have to be adjusted as well. > > > > i tried to make these changes. Please verify if they look OK.
The changes look ok to me. However, it seem the gpaw-setups package does not install the data files anywhere, if I build the package, it is empty. This is either a left-over bug from renaming the package or, (more likely because there is upstream build system and nothing obvious handling it in debian/) an oversight. I assume the files should go into /usr/share/gpaw? Is there some way to tell gpaw where it should look for its data files by default? Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
