Hi, On 2021-08-02 4:30 p.m., Samuel Henrique wrote: > Hello, > >>> The best thing you could do, from our POV, is to push your packaging >>> files to salsa, under your user. But hosting your work anywhere and in >>> any way can be helpful, it's gonna be up to the people working on >>> those packages to check it out, though. >>> Guilherme (who's working on seclists) mentioned he would like to see >>> what you've done in the other thread. >>> >> Not too sure how does Salsa work for "outsider" ? > > You can do pretty much anything under your user on salsa (just like > when you use gitlab or github), you are only limited to not pushing > changes to other people's/teams projects (but you can always create > your own under your user). > >> Those are the packages I made for Buster. >> >> Some of them are local compile of buster-backports, some of them may be >> from testing, and some may not be related to security. >> Mostly everything related to security comes from Kali. > > I checked out seclists and I don't think I understand, that packaging > probably didn't come from Kali cause it's missing some important > things from Kali's packaging of seclists around that time. I couldn't > identify what changes there were required for the Debian packaging, > eg.: why didn't you use Kali's package instead? > > My suggestion is to identify a package which you think it's the > closest to be ready for Debian and then work on that. But it's > important to check what are the differences in your packaging vs > Kali's to evaluate if it's better to start from scratch (based on > Kali's packaging) or continue with your version. > zoneminder zaproxy cuckoo winexe wordlists webshells veil-* metasploit-framework (?) I think I saw a Debian repository for this one beef-xss john johnny linux-exploit-suggester
Those are some example that first comes to mind. Again, they may not be update to date with Kali or whatever else. This was only a project I did on my spare time for my own purpose. Came to mind some other may be interested when I saw the message about SecLists not so long ago. Probably it would have been better to keep them for myself too. Everything I did can be done by anyone who has a spare half hour. > Thank you, > > -- > Samuel Henrique <samueloph> > -- Polyna-Maude R.-Summerside -Be smart, Be wise, Support opensource development
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature