On Thu, Mar 01, 2001 at 05:07:43AM +0000, Jacob Meuser wrote: > > My potatos have > deb http://security.debian.org stable/updates main contrib non-free > in /etc/apt/sources.list > That was in there by default, I just uncommented it. (it was there in r0 too, it was there but commented out by default? hrm i wonder why that is, it does not much good being commented out... > by the way). I never thought about it, but that doesn't cover the non-US > packages, does or does it? i guess it does, my non-us lines get packages files, but i never really bothered to see if they are ever used. it can't hurt anything ;-) -- Ethan Benson http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/
- SSH with potato, not very secure? Runar Bell
- Re: SSH with potato, not very secure? Ethan Benson
- Re: SSH with potato, not very secure? Richard
- Re: SSH with potato, not very secure? Jacob Meuser
- Re: SSH with potato, not very secure? Maarten Vink
- Re: SSH with potato, not very secure? Hans Spaans
- Re: SSH with potato, not very secure? Ethan Benson
- Re: SSH with potato, not very secure? Hubert Chan
- Re: SSH with potato, not very secure? Jacob Meuser
- Re: SSH with potato, not very secure? Noah L. Meyerhans
- Re: SSH with potato, not very secure? Runar Bell
- Re: SSH with potato, not very secure? Tollef Fog Heen
- Re: SSH with potato, not very secure? Jacob Meuser
- Re: SSH with potato, not very secure? Kevin van Haaren
- Re: SSH with potato, not very secure? Runar Bell
- Re: SSH with potato, not very secure? Jacob Meuser
- Re: SSH with potato, not very secure? Ethan Benson