On Fri, Mar 02, 2001 at 11:39:15AM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > * Ethan Benson > > | On Thu, Mar 01, 2001 at 05:07:43AM +0000, Jacob Meuser wrote: > | > > | > My potatos have > | > deb http://security.debian.org stable/updates main contrib non-free > | > in /etc/apt/sources.list > | > That was in there by default, I just uncommented it. (it was there in r0 too, > | > | it was there but commented out by default? hrm i wonder why that is, > | it does not much good being commented out... > > Not everyone has a permanent internet connection.. It should probably > ask whether you want to have it in there. > I believe it becomes uncommented if one installs over the network? (That would make sense to ME anyway.) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: SSH with potato, not very secure? Richard
- Re: SSH with potato, not very secure? Jacob Meuser
- Re: SSH with potato, not very secure? Maarten Vink
- Re: SSH with potato, not very secure? Hans Spaans
- Re: SSH with potato, not very secure? Ethan Benson
- Re: SSH with potato, not very secure? Hubert Chan
- Re: SSH with potato, not very secure? Jacob Meuser
- Re: SSH with potato, not very secure? Noah L. Meyerhans
- Re: SSH with potato, not very secure? Runar Bell
- Re: SSH with potato, not very secure? Tollef Fog Heen
- Re: SSH with potato, not very secure? Jacob Meuser
- Re: SSH with potato, not very secure? Kevin van Haaren
- Re: SSH with potato, not very secure? Runar Bell
- Re: SSH with potato, not very secure? Jacob Meuser
- Re: SSH with potato, not very secure? Ethan Benson
- Re: SSH with potato, not very secure? William R. Ward
- Re: SSH with potato, not very secure? Tollef Fog Heen
- Re: SSH with potato, not very secure? Jacob Meuser