This one time, at band camp, Hal said: > I run a potato server on an ethernet behind a firewall connected by dsl to the >internet. The only service exposed is ftp, In the middle of last night ippl >reported an ftp connection attempt from 192.168.1,1 The network behind my firewall >uses 192.168.75.xx addressses for one Redhat and a couple of Windows machines as well >as the debian ftp server. Any idea where the 192.168.1.1 attempt is coming from? Is >it likely to have been spoofed over the internet as part of an attack? > > -- > ---> Hal <----> [EMAIL PROTECTED] <--- > -- > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > It may have been, or it may have been somebody else on a LAN, with IP addressing schema 192.168.1.x, who forgot to use passive-ftp. I guess you'd have to look around and see what they tried to do. HTH, Steve -- No problem is so formidable that you can't just walk away from it. -- C. Schulz
msg05987/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature