my Finger Daemon conclusion... First, Thanks for all the answers to my question.
Well, so it really seems it's better to avoid using any finger daemon, security has always priority. Anyway I thought the finger daemon would be a nice feature for the .plan files, userinfo and mail info for the users of my box. Maybe running fingerd in a chrooted jail as not-root user would be a secure-like solution, got to think about it. Thanks again for all the replays, have a nice time... -Ivo On Sat, 2002-01-05 at 19:09, eim wrote: > Hello, > > I'm planing to install a secure finger daemon > on one of the public boxes I admin. > > Well, out there are really many different finger > daemons and in the Debian stable tree I can find: > > * efingerd - Another finger daemon for unix > capable of fine-tuning your output. > * xfingerd - BSD-like finger daemon with qmail support. > * ffingerd - A secure finger daemon > * fingerd - Remote user information server. > * cfingerd - Configurable and secure finger daemon > > So I've considered using fingered which should be secure. > > Often I hear and read about exploited finger daemons which > gave the attacker system access so I'm asking on this list > help about the F Daemon. > > Which Finger daemon is *really* secure ? > Shouldn't I install this service at all ? > Any experiences about compromised systems ? > > Thanks for any help ! > Have a nice time, > - Ivo > > -- > > »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« > Ivo Marino [EMAIL PROTECTED] > UN*X Developer, running Debian GNU/Linux > irc.OpenProjects.net #debian > http://eimbox.org > »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« Ivo Marino [EMAIL PROTECTED] UN*X Developer, running Debian GNU/Linux irc.OpenProjects.net #debian http://eimbox.org »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »«