On Thursday 04 August 2005 00:25, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > What is wrong with volatile? It's for exactly this case.
No it is not. volatile-sloppy [1] may be (if that's implemented). [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/05/msg00016.html
pgpQYcm3oGbIO.pgp
Description: PGP signature
