I'm wondering if we should version the major releases of stuff like docbook-xml and docbook. For instance, should we have one docbook package with 2.4.1, 3.0, 3.1 and 4.1, as we do now, or should we perhaps break that up into docbook-2, docbook-3.0, docbook-3.1, docbook-4.1 ? Thoughts? -- .....Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]<URL:http://www.onshored.com/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: DTD packages and versioning Adam Di Carlo
- Re: DTD packages and versioning James LewisMoss
- Re: DTD packages and versioning Mark Johnson
- Re: DTD packages and versioning Adam Di Carlo

