>>>>> On 18 Mar 2001 17:21:28 -0500, Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Adam> I'm wondering if we should version the major releases of stuff
Adam> like docbook-xml and docbook. For instance, should we have one
Adam> docbook package with 2.4.1, 3.0, 3.1 and 4.1, as we do now, or
Adam> should we perhaps break that up into docbook-2, docbook-3.0,
Adam> docbook-3.1, docbook-4.1 ?
Adam> Thoughts?
It's not a lot of stuff. I'd just keep it all in one package.
Jim
--
@James LewisMoss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Blessed Be!
@ http://jimdres.home.mindspring.com | Linux is kewl!
@"Argue for your limitations and sure enough, they're yours." Bach
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
