> Is it SILO or the kernel that needs to be fixed? Is it like the zImage/bzImage > issue of where in memory the kernel is placed, and if so, can it be made to > load elsewhere?
There's nothing to fix. This limitation comes from the OBP firmware. I've been building kernels just fine for a long time, and not hit this limit recently. So long as you use the arch/sparc{,64}/boot/image file, and use modules, you shouldn't either. The kernel supports modules for a reason. -- Debian - http://www.debian.org/ Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/ Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/ WatchGuard - http://www.watchguard.com/