On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 12:57:00PM -0400, Clint Adams wrote:
> Other than problems with auric, the release team is concerned[1] about
Also, it seems they don't consider vore as enough to have buildd
redundancy:
04:47 < vorlon> neuro: using vore as one of two buildds leaves no margin for
error anyway, there were times
toward the end of sarge when it wasn't keeping up with load; so
we'd need two other buildds
besides vore to really qualify
04:48 < neuro> vorlon: "one buildd" is not a unit of measure. One auric is
enough to keep up by itself
04:48 < aj> mips: 10 users, mipsel: 50 users; d-i for both; upstream: yes for
both; 1 buildd for both; "in
progress" buildd redundancy; "ok" 24/7
04:48 < vorlon> neuro: and one vore is not; so auric+vore isn't N+1 redundancy
04:50 < vorlon> not as it was meant :)
--
.''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
: :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer
`. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`- people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
