Wow, let's just stretch the meaning to burden things even more. "Needs two buildd's", but wait "two machines isn't enough".
On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 12:40:36AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 12:57:00PM -0400, Clint Adams wrote: > > Other than problems with auric, the release team is concerned[1] about > > Also, it seems they don't consider vore as enough to have buildd > redundancy: > > 04:47 < vorlon> neuro: using vore as one of two buildds leaves no margin for > error anyway, there were times > toward the end of sarge when it wasn't keeping up with load; > so we'd need two other buildds > besides vore to really qualify > 04:48 < neuro> vorlon: "one buildd" is not a unit of measure. One auric is > enough to keep up by itself > 04:48 < aj> mips: 10 users, mipsel: 50 users; d-i for both; upstream: yes for > both; 1 buildd for both; "in > progress" buildd redundancy; "ok" 24/7 > 04:48 < vorlon> neuro: and one vore is not; so auric+vore isn't N+1 redundancy > 04:50 < vorlon> not as it was meant :) > > > -- > .''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 > : :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer > `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] > `- people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- Ubuntu - http://www.ubuntu.com/ Debian - http://www.debian.org/ Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/ SwissDisk - http://www.swissdisk.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
