On Sun, Apr 01, 2007 at 12:56:19PM -0700, Andrew Sharp wrote: > > > > | The first partition has to be ext3 or fd [...] > > > > The man said that it works for him(tm)... that sounds relevant :) > > Relevance wasn't questioned; your conclusion was questioned.
My conclusion was that he said that a separate non-RAID partition is not actually necessary, which is exactly what he wrote... See the whole post at http://lists.debian.org/debian-sparc/2006/04/msg00021.html > Regardless of this quote, I can tell you from experience that it does > not work to have the first partition be a raid partition and start from > cylinder 0. > > This is the first time I've heard that you can't boot if the first > partition is swap and starts at cyl 1. Sounds bogus to me. I guess I'll just have to test and see. -- 2. That which causes joy or happiness. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]