On Tue, Mar 06, 2001 at 04:44:02AM -0500, Dale Scheetz wrote: > So, which of the various tet-tex packages do I bug report?
I'm not sure. Try grepping for mktexlsr or texhash in /var/lib/dpkg/info/t*.p* > Does lintian check this sort of violation? (I could then figure it out > from my .deb cache) I don't think it does. (It would seem hard to check for such a thing, too) > Does apt-get log its activity? Not automatically. > > > > > Is there any reason that we can't include progeny's version of > > > > > Mozilla in > > > > > Debian Woody until such time as our maintainer delivers his release. > > > > ~~~~~ sid/unstable > > > > > > > > FWIW I agree... so what if the package is not tiptop, it's good enough > > > > for > > > > unstable. > > > > > > Well, I don't know where you get the "not tiptop" from. The Progeny > > > release has a working psm and the release in Debian doesn't. Which one is > > > not "tiptop"? > > > > It's a 9 MB package that takes over 26 MB of disk space to install, surely > > that's not the best way to package it. > > Let me put it this way. Currently the unstable release of Mozilla is 0 MB, > the available replacement for this package is 26 MB and produces actual > functionality that the 0 MB package doesn't. Which would you rather have. > > Or yet another way: The stable version is 9 MB but can't communicate with > my bank, but the 26 MB version can. Is 15 MB such a large price to pay? You do understand that I agree with you? :) My comment was about not being tiptop, I said it's fine for unstable... -- Digital Electronic Being Intended for Assassination and Nullification -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
