On jue, oct 19, 2000 at 05:42:49 +0200, Javier Viñuales Gutiérrez wrote: > A fecha de hoy, puedes hacer tranquilo un 'apt-get update; apt-get upgrade' > con spidermonkey en tu sources.list :)
Acaba de corroborármelo el responsable de los paquetes debian de Helix GNOME Peter Teichman. ----- Forwarded message from Peter Teichman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ----- Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 11:52:26 -0400 To: Javier Vi?uales Guti?rrez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: stable vs unstable Debian packages User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; from [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, Oct 19, 2000 at 05:51:03PM +0200 From: Peter Teichman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-UIDL: 38f1cfff2c5657c832484c8e40834471 On Thu, Oct 19, 2000 at 05:51:03PM +0200, Javier Vi?uales Guti?rrez wrote: > On mar, sep 26, 2000 at 09:37:23 -0400, Peter Teichman wrote: > > I'm working on changing that now. Our current setup has been fine so > > far, but definitely needs to be changed soon. The scheme you suggest > > is exactly what I am working toward. > > Hi Peter, since this email from you I'v been waiting for changing the > structure of gonme helixcode debian packages tree: "stable" and "unstable". > > Are you working on it, there are many debian user that ask me about this and > I don't know the answer of this quiestion: is it dangerous to use > 'apt-get upgrade' on Potato with "unstable" from glibc upgrade to 2.2 > point of view?. It has always been safe to upgrade the Helix GNOME packages. I'm building them all on Potato at the moment. Peter ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Javier Viñuales Gutiérrez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Webs: http://www.ctv.es/USERS/vigu Personal PGP public key: http://www.ctv.es/USERS/vigu/vigu.pubkey