Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
They are probably doing what gjc (gnu java compiler) does. Compilling byte-compilledAlso byte-compiled code is quite slow. Compilling the code kind ofthis however is no longer really true. The Java apps I have used were slow to launch but behaved just like any other C/C++ program once running. The old argument about java's speed are as valid as the old arguments against writing C++ code on Unix. Time and software have changed and the hardware has also caught up.
defeats it's purpose as c++ would be better in that case. IMHO g++ is
more mature than gjc (gnu java compiler).
files to native executables and then running them. That's practically the same thing as
compilling c++, but slightly less optimized. On the other hand if they run the bytecode
directly that would be much slower.
Bijan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
