On Thu, Jun 17, 2004 at 11:32:36AM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote: > Micha Feigin wrote: > > And you neither. > > > What about the usage of the graphic hardware BTW, I don't see it in > > there, plus a bunch of other system resource usage. > > > You do like looking at the small picture. > > Uhm, no, that's you. You only see "more memory means more crap going on." > What about graphic resources? What of it? As I mentioned in another thread > you can turn it off. I run KDE on this machine literally 24/7. It's my > do-all Linux box on the network. I don't have transparencies, gradiants, > wizzing, zooming, farting options turned on. They're all turned off. Gee, > because of that my graphics usage is low. It has to be. I run the bloody > thing through VNC (which I mentioned) so my graphics resources is my network! > > Get over your simplistic bias of "big = bad" already. It's called let the > people tailor what they want and need to their tastes JUST LIKE YOU HAVE YOURS > and stop spreading BS FUD. >
I do believe big = bad especially when you can keep it small and get the same result, but I guess you won't convince me and I won't convince you so I will drop it at this point, you can keep going if you want. > -- > Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your > PGP Key: 8B6E99C5 | main connection to the switchboard of souls. > -------------------------------+--------------------------------------------- > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > This Mail Was Scanned By Mail-seCure System > at the Tel-Aviv University CC. > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
