On 2004-06-22, Jules Dubois penned: > On Mon, 21 Jun 2004 14:38:51 -0500, Michael Satterwhite wrote: > >> On Monday 21 June 2004 12:03, Monique Y. Mudama wrote: >>> If you're trying to avoid any downtime or difficulty whatsoever, run >>> stable and live with the age of the packages. >> >> Not exactly promoting Debian, are we? > > She is. Debian stable is an excellent argument in favor of running a > Debian release. There's no other distribution or flavor providing its > reliability or availability.
Indeed. I actually meant my statement to be in support of the stable distribution. I guess I should have made that clearer. Still, no one benefits from having blinders over their eyes. Stable is the most stable, and it's also the least current. I don't see how it could be any other way. They're on opposite ends of the same spectrum. >> Others here, however, are doing a much better job. > > You've missed the point and owe an apology. I appreciate the vote of confidence, but it's okay. Everyone's entitled to a cranky day once in a while. -- monique -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]