On 2004-06-23, Goedson Paixao penned: > On Wed, 23 Jun 2004 08:40:54 -0600, Monique Y. Mudama >> Now I'm confused. A search through packages.debian.org turns up >> gpg4pine and pine-docs, not to mention something called pine-tracker >> that appears to be a way to check your installed version of pine >> against the official version ... but no pine. > > You can only find pine in source form because it's licencing terms > disallow distribution of binaries obtained from modified source IIRC. > You must apt-get source pine and build the packages yourself.
See, I knew there was a license issue! Hrm. So either the prepackaged pine to which the OP referred is a licensing violation, or debian feels strongly enough about some mods to distribute as source rather than distribute the canonical form? Well, whatever. I use mutt, so it's academic to me. -- monique -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
