> I would prefer a much improved dselect. > Todays dselect is not convinient to be used. > It is like emacs to the novice. (cryptic, non-standard interface, funny > keyboard accel keys, no menues...)
Hmmm - I got on well with dselect from the beginning, without reading any documentation about it, and I find it a convenient, useful tool. <grin> Am I in a minority of one, I wonder? I'd be very interested to learn what people's specific gripes are. -- Mark -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
