On Fri, 21 Mar 1997, Santiago Vila Doncel wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > On Thu, 20 Mar 1997, Jason Costomiris wrote: > > Can we get this list to set a Reply-to: header, like every other piece of > > list software I've ever used? It's kind of a PITA to do a reply that goes > > only to the list with the current configuration. > > Please read: > > http://garcon.unicom.com/FAQ/reply-to-harmful.html
Ok, I've read it. It's a bunch of bunk. I use pine for mail. If there's a reply-to: header set, I get asked if I should use the reply-to: header instead of that of the author. I also get asked if I would like to reply to all. That pages drones on endlessly about "reasonable mailers". Pine is quite reasonable, and apparently handles Reply-to: better than most mailers. I also noticed your message id: Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> What do you know? You're using pine too. You should also be able to use this feature. If the list won't start doing it, I think I'll just start using some formail action to do it myself. Jason Costomiris | Finger for PGP 2.6.2 Public Key [EMAIL PROTECTED] | "There is a fine line between idiocy My employers like me, but not | and genius. We aim to erase that line" enough to let me speak for them. | --Unknown http://www.jasons.org/~jcostom