> My first question would be are these valid IP addresses or did you pick
> arbitrary addresses for your local systems?
As that question was asked by several people, the 192.168.101.x addresses
are arbritrary addresses for my own subnet. The 193.135.252.47 and
193.135.252.179 were addresses assigned to me by my ISP. Both are routed
from his machine, so if I try a traceroute from icemark to
firefrancs new address without setting the host-route for .179 to my
second machine first, the traceroute packets just 'run in circles' between
icemark and lisa. Still, there's one host at thenet that still needs to be
configured properly (traceroute from the outside currently stops before
reaching lisa, but that will be fixed soon). The problem on my own system
can't currently be solved by thenet, as their "linux guy" is on a
holiday at the moment...
> > lisa.thenet.ch icemark.thenet.ch firefranc
> > ppp0 193.135.252.75 193.135.252.47
> > eth0 192.168.101.1 192.168.101.2
[...]
> > The new setup should look like:
> > ISP My systems
> > lisa.thenet.ch icemark.thenet.ch firefranc.thenet.ch
> > <--- ppp0 ---> <--- eth0 --->
> > 193.135.252.75 193.135.252.47 193.135.252.179
Two people here suggested, that I might route the .179 address along the
192.168.101.0 network, but both couldn't tell me exactly how the icemark
needs to be set up, so that packets leaving firefranc out to the internet
have the proper sender address (193.135.252.179)...
Any more ideas anyone?
Benedikt
signoff
---
Benedikt Eric Heinen - Muehlemattstrasse 53 - CH3007 Bern - SWITZERLAND
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
