> > Sudhakar Chandrasekharan: > > That worked. As you said, there *should* be another way to specify > > local packages. Though I can understand why update-menus does not add > > an item if the package is not installed. > > My preference is that a new test be added (or it might already exist, for > all I know), like: > > ?file(/usr/local/bin/vim): ...
/usr/doc/menu/BUGS now contains: - update-menus: ? -package($p) is not general enough! (Joey: file(/usr/local/bin/vim)) (the last line I just added). > The menu package used to allow any menu file starting with "local" to ignore > whether the package was installed or not, so you could make a local.vim menu > file. However, then the menu package changed a lot of things, and this no > longer works. Yes, that was a bug introduced in menu-1.3. I fixed it now in the source, but haven't tested it yet (and, just now I checked again to see whether I fixed it and I saw I did mess it up slightly, but now it should be OK, I think). -- joost witteveen, [EMAIL PROTECTED] #!/bin/perl -sp0777i<X+d*lMLa^*lN%0]dsXx++lMlN/dsM0<j]dsj $/=unpack('H*',$_);$_=`echo 16dio\U$k"SK$/SM$n\EsN0p[lN*1 lK[d2%Sa2/d0$^Ixp"|dc`;s/\W//g;$_=pack('H*',/((..)*)$/) #what's this? see http://www.dcs.ex.ac.uk/~aba/rsa/ -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .