>>>>> "JT" == James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I think he should at least watch this list. JT> I think it's unfair for you to demand (by implication) that every JT> developer read debian.user, it's not low-volume and people only JT> have a limited amount of time. Normally yes. But if you know there is a known bug in your package, and by one reason or another you can't/don't want to fix it, it would be nice to have a look sometimes at the list. I'm just a bit upset. It took me some time to find it, and it was a known bug... JT> As I understand it, this is a problem which occurs when upgrading JT> to unstable/, if one is tracking stable/ it won't matter (no new JT> versions of gcc/cpp -> no chance for them to get out of sync). JT> And since the fix is now (or will be) in unstable, I think your JT> point is moot. In my case, I installed some packages from unstable (gcc and cpp among them). After that, I noted that g77 didn't work with the new gcc (and there was no newer g77). I had to downgrade. All this happened in the same day I installed Debian, so I had no chance to note that I've broken the system with this incursion in unstable. It's over now. :-) -- Emilio C. Lopes <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
