Hamish Moffatt hat gesagt: // Hamish Moffatt wrote: ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > mutt can handle message status (read or unread) in folders > other than your inbox where elm does not. It is very elm-like > but seems faster and smaller yet just as functional to me. > For the same reason, it may be too elm-like to meet your requirements.
I have used elm for some years now and recently switched to mutt. I have to say: Mutt is a really really great mail reader. Every elm user absolutely has to give it a try, it's so much better, IMHO, faster and more configureable. If you fear the conversion of mail folders/boxes: Not necessary, because Mutt reads them all! Or in the words of mutt-developer Micheal Elkins ( = the ME in elm-ME): `All mail clients suck. This one just sucks less.' -- Yours, Frank Barknecht <<<<---------------------------------------------------->>>> <a href="http://www.koeln-online.de/einblick/"> Das Kölner Stadt- und Unimagazin </a> <<<<--------------------------------------------------->>>>> -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .