That's why the name Debian-lite makes me sick. It reminds me of those commercial products where you have to pay for a full version of the product.
If the name is to be changed at all, it should be 'complete' or 'universal'. I actually prefer to keep the current name unless research shows that 'Debian95' or 'Debian-NT' will sell better. :) On Sat, 2 Aug 1997, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > On Fri, Aug 01, 1997 at 05:29:13PM -0700, Travis Cole wrote: > > On 01-Aug-97 Paul Wade wrote: > > >A single CD that allowed a wide range of installation types should have a > > >powerful name. > > > > > >Debian Complete? > > >Debian Universal Linux? > > >Multiple Personality Debian? :) > > > > Take a look at Caldara's naming conventions. Open Linux Base, Open Linux > > Standard, and Open Linux Deluxe. > > Why not just Debian? It sounds like you are suggesting that actual > different versions should be shipped! With free software, > there's no price difference, so no need. +----------------------------------------------------------------------+ + Paul Wade Greenbush Technologies Corporation + + mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.greenbush.com/ + +----------------------------------------------------------------------+ + http://www.greenbush.com/cds.html Now shipping version 1.3.X + +----------------------------------------------------------------------+ -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
