On Fri, 22 Aug 1997, Paul Wade wrote: > Good point, John. It seems that the sugar-coated explanation still doesn't > taste very good. Hey, users who are listening - Debian 1.3.3 is out but > it's still called 1.3.1 so nobody who buys those CD sets will feel > inferior? We need someone with a Ph.D. in policy analysis to convince us > that it really does taste good. Why don't we just call it Debian GNU/Linux > 1.3.1.your_lucky_number?
Sorry friend, but this is false. 1.3.1 is out. The few changes that have been made to it were done so in error. I believe that resulted from Guy's absense. But, mistakes will be made occaisionally in any case. None of the packages in bo-updates have been released into the official distribution. In case you haven't noticed, we've been trying to implement some new quality control procedures with 1.3, and it's up to the testing manager, Dale, to approve the packages before they go into the main distribution. This is the first time we've tried this, and it looks like bo-updates was the wrong name for the updates that are not yet approved by the testing group. Syrus. -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Syrus Nemat-Nasser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> UCSD Physics Dept. -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
