Paul Serice writes: > Suppose, Bruce is "going to drive tomorrow to Santa Cruz (from Berkeley) > to participate in a meeting for Debian," and on the way he causes an > accident. Before incorporation, no one knew how far the liability tail > extended.
Are you an attorney? I'm not. I find it hard to believe that there is no case law on this. I also find it hard to believe that any court could be convinced that the maintainers had either the opportunity or the duty to prevent Bruce from driving drunk :) > By the way, last time I checked, in all 50 states, anarchists have no > special exemptions. I'm sure Dave will be glad to know that. BTW, I am not opposed to incorporation. I merely expressed skepticism about the liability paranoia. -- John Hasler This posting is in the public domain. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Do with it what you will. Dancing Horse Hill Make money from it if you can; I don't mind. Elmwood, Wisconsin Do not send email advertisements to this address. -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
