On Wed, 14 Jan 1998, Jeff Noxon wrote:

> pppd[24325]: pppd 2.3.2 started by LOGIN, uid 0
[...]
> pppd[24325]: rcvd [PAP AuthReq id=0x1 user="pierre" password="<censored>"]
> pppd[24325]: PAP authentication failure for pierre
> pppd[24325]: sent [PAP AuthNak id=0x1 "Login incorrect"]
> pppd[24325]: sent [LCP TermReq id=0x2 "Authentication failed"]

Still no luck, but I started to suspect something about PAM... 2.2.0f did
not use PAM, 2.3.2 seems to do so.... any ideas?



--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .

Reply via email to