Must have been a pre-release then. The Slackware 3.5 CD has v2.0 and v2.1 directories, and he was about to install the latest 2.1, until I explained that 2.1 series are developmental, so he went to the 2.0 directory and installed the newest one in there, which was a 2.0.35, because I told him it would be safe. (I hope it will be safe :)
Chris Hamish Moffatt wrote: > On Fri, Jul 03, 1998 at 12:42:52AM -0700, Christopher Barry wrote: > > One of my friends just installed Slackware and had the same problem. He > > used the > > 2.0.35 kernel but I'm pretty certain you'll be fine with the 2.0.34. I > > don't know what > > Must have been a 2.0.35 pre-release, or an error; > > finger @linux.kernel.org > [linux.kernel.org] > > The latest stable version of the Linux kernel is: 2.0.34 > The latest *beta* version of the Linux kernel is: 2.1.108 > > Hamish > -- > Hamish Moffatt, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Latest Debian packages at ftp://ftp.rising.com.au/pub/hamish. PGP#EFA6B9D5 > CCs of replies from mailing lists are welcome. http://hamish.home.ml.org > > -- > Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null -- Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null
