On Wed, Jul 08, 1998 at 10:46:58AM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > On Tue, Jul 07, 1998 at 07:03:57PM -0500, Mark Mealman wrote: > > Just the C++ part, mind you, C is still compiled by gcc. > > > > Ever compile a C++ program that was authored under gcc with egcs' strictly > > ANSI > > C++ compiler? > > Debian 2.0 has this too -- gcc is the GNU standard one (2.7.2.3), > g++ is the egcs one (1.0.3a). egcs gcc is also available.
Yeah, and this is really great, because gcc 2.7 c++ really sucks (I think this is the thread were anything sucks anyway, so I feel safe to express this :) Honest: I can understand that gcc 2.7 C++ causes problems, but only because gcc 2.7 C++ is so far from any C++ standard it's no fun. However, do we still have the old C++ package in hamm as an optrion for the user? (As we have, for example, a complete libc5 development tree in hamm)? Marcus -- "Rhubarb is no Egyptian god." Debian GNU/Linux finger brinkmd@ Marcus Brinkmann http://www.debian.org master.debian.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] for public PGP Key http://homepage.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/Marcus.Brinkmann/ PGP Key ID 36E7CD09 -- Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null
