On Thu, Aug 20, 1998 at 09:22:52PM +0800, Richard L. Alhama wrote: > On 19 Aug 1998, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Yes, no, and not unless you want to. Even without enabling the > > generic command server and the @SH processing, the rules file for > > mailagent is a full fledged state machines, and one can apply the > > rules recursively, and the actio is idfferent depending on what state > > on is in. > > I wish to obtain the example setup =8). Is the sample setup on the deb > file sufficient for my needs? Or is it sufficient for yours or us all > subscribed to debian-user? This is the only thing I need, separate > debian-user from my $INBOX.
I missed most of this discussion but... whats wrong with the old standby procmail? Here is the procmail filter I use here at work (not as complex as the one at home but...I don't care as much since here I fetchmail -k) anyway...procmail is easy and great...and I am yet to see a unix-like system without it... and...here is my filter: :0 * ^X-Mailing-List: <debian-user@lists.debian.org> /home/sjc/mail/debian-user :0 * ^X-Mailing-List: <debian-devel@lists.debian.org> /home/sjc/mail/debian-devel :0 * ^X-Mailing-List: <debian-mentors@lists.debian.org> /home/sjc/mail/debian-mentors :0 * ^X-Mailing-List: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> /home/sjc/mail/debian-private :0 * ^X-Mailing-List: <debian-sparc@lists.debian.org> /home/sjc/mail/debian-sparc :0 * ^Sender: Bugtraq List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> /home/sjc/mail/bugtraq --end--- -Steve -- /* -- Stephen Carpenter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>------------ */ E-mail "Bumper Stickers": "A FREE America or a Drug-Free America: You can't have both!" "honk if you Love Linux"