On Mon, 22 Mar 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Bob Nielsen dixit: > > On Mon, 22 Mar 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > > > Of course, no US-based vendor is going to ship non-US to Rainer who's > > > > > domain is .de; that's the whole point of non-US. > > > > > > you sure? I thought they wouldn't ship non-US to someone whose domain is > > > a > > > US based one. For instance, pgp, from outside the US we need to get it as > > > pgp-i from non-US, whereas from within the US you'll get "plain" pgp ... > > > which > > > does not belong to non-US. > > > > > > Of course, a different issue is whether a US based vendor may ship ANY > > > crypto > > > related program outside the US borders. > > > > The pgp vs. pgp-i issue is one of copyright. Both are non-us. > > fine, but how about mutt vs. mutt-i?
I'm not that familiar with mutt (I use pine with pinepgp, myself) The description of mutt sounds a bit suspiciously like it should belong in non-us: This package contains cryptographic code, so it may be illegal for you to use, import or export it depending on your country's laws. However, if the package doesn't actually contain encryption code, but just the hooks to use it with pgp, etc. (as does pinepgp), than it doesn't need to be in non-us (but the description should be revised). pgp is suggested, so that possibly is the case. I can't comment on mutt-i, since it doesn't show up in any of my Packages files. Bob > > Horacio. > > -- > Claves - GnuPG/PGP - Keys : http://www.rediris.es/cert/keyserver > o/or > Envía un mensaje vacío a [EMAIL PROTECTED] con la línea de asunto: > Send a blank message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the subject line: > Tipo de Clave/Key Type Asunto:/Subject: > > DSA/ElGamal fetch dsa/elgamal > DSS/Diffie-Hellman fetch dh/dss > RSA fetch rsa > ---- Bob Nielsen Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tucson, AZ AMPRnet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] DM42nh http://www.primenet.com/~nielsen
