On Mon, Nov 15, 1999 at 01:36:26PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote: > On Mon, Nov 15, 1999 at 01:11:34PM -0500, Ian Stirling wrote: > > "E.L. Meijer (Eric)" wrote: > > > > > I think it is a bad idea to call it `debian gimp'. If you do that you > > > suggest that debian has a heavily modified, enhanced version of gimp. > > > If I were one of the gimp developers I wouldn't like it if someone (say > > > Corel) would take it, remove some plugins, and then tack their name on > > > it (`Corel gimp'??). > > > > > > Eric > > > > They are entitled to if it's gpl software but it would > > be rude and inconsiderate. What about 'debian-gimp-lite'? > > Why does Debian have to be in there? Why not just `gimp-lite'? >
Why not just preach? 'gimp-libre'? Rob -- Insufficient facts always invite danger. -- Spock, "Space Seed", stardate 3141.9