Tuesday, May 23, 2000, 7:39:16 AM, Jesse wrote: >> (X)Emacs with CPerl mode.
> Even that's not, hmmm, what it should be. Cases that come to mind are > certain regular expressions and here documents. Unless I've been > using a different Perl mode in Emacs. Not to mention I fail to see how Emacs got into the discussion of "Simple Text Editor..." Lisp interpreters with dillusions of OShood doesn't meet any of those three words. -- Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your ICQ: 5107343 | main connection to the switchboard of souls. -------------------------------+---------------------------------------------