on 5/23/00 11:28 AM, Steve Lamb at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Not to mention I fail to see how Emacs got into the discussion of "Simple
> Text Editor..." Lisp interpreters with dillusions of OShood doesn't meet any
> of those three words.
Go back and read the text you snipped. The question got changed to "text
editor with best Perl syntax highlighting", without a concomitant change in
subject line. (X)Emacs certainly qualifies, despite it's editing functions
being only a subset of it's full functionality.
That said, could we pretty please with sugared bits on it not have this
flame fest again?
john.
--
[ John S Jacobs Anderson ]------><URL:mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[ Genehack: Not your daddy's weblog ]------><URL:http://genehack.org>
