On Sun, Nov 19, 2000 at 05:16:05PM -0600, Phil Brutsche wrote: > > I would assume that if I could just set it through mutt, then > > masquerading in exim would be pointless wouldn't it? > > If you're unable to set the correct email address in mutt, it's very > simple to get exim on your local machine to re-write references to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (or whatever your login name is) in the email headers to be > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
That's what I was doing and it worked fine, except that debconf was sending mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], which most definitely isn't me. I would like to know a way to stop that without having to stop exim from doing that for me, since I've yet to find a way to set the from address in mutt. -Rob
